<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tobacco Use Info &#187; Households</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tobaccouse.info/category/households/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info</link>
	<description>Tobacco production news &#124; Tobacco Info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apartment-dwelling children, tobacco-smoke exposure &#8212; and a new front in the tobacco wars?</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/apartment-dwelling-children-tobacco-smoke-exposure-and-a-new-front-in-the-tobacco-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/apartment-dwelling-children-tobacco-smoke-exposure-and-a-new-front-in-the-tobacco-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco smoke.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=6471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tobacco smoke doesn&#8217;t concern itself with doors or privacy. It goes where it wants, even through ventilation systems, walls, shared air spaces. Such invasiveness could be a particular problem for children who live in apartments.
So suggests a report published online Monday in the journal Pediatrics. Here&#8217;s the short version of that children-and-smoke study &#8212; and the full version, for those so inclined.
Using national health survey data, researchers established that, among kids not living with someone who smoked inside the home, those who lived in apartments were exposed to su <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/apartment-dwelling-children-tobacco-smoke-exposure-and-a-new-front-in-the-tobacco-wars/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/apartment-dwelling-children-tobacco-smoke-exposure-and-a-new-front-in-the-tobacco-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoking ban in public housing would be good for public health, advocates say</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/smoking-ban-in-public-housing-would-be-good-for-public-health-advocates-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/smoking-ban-in-public-housing-would-be-good-for-public-health-advocates-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=5479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
Generally speaking, the federal government is in the business of protecting public health. It works hard to ensure that medicines are safe before they can be sold to the public. It issues recalls when toys pose choking dangers to small children. Last year, it got expanded power to regulate the tobacco industry so it could do more to discourage smoking, especially among kids.
So why not protect the 7 million people who live in public housing by banning smoking in those complexes?
That’s the question posed by a pediatrician and two lawyers who focus on the public health consequences of smokin <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/smoking-ban-in-public-housing-would-be-good-for-public-health-advocates-say/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/smoking-ban-in-public-housing-would-be-good-for-public-health-advocates-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winters housing to soon be smoke free</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/winters-housing-to-soon-be-smoke-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/winters-housing-to-soon-be-smoke-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 10:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke-free]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=4719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Winters city officials have taken a proactive step by passing a resolution encouraging the housing complexes designate at least half of their property as smoke-free.
The city is the second municipality in Yolo County to pass this resolution, following Woodland which passed it in April 2008. As many California cities debate laws to ban smoking in outdoor and indoor spaces, more and more Yolo County multi-unit housing complexes are going smoke-free.
At least 16 Yolo County multi-unit housing complexes restrict smoking in at least 50 percent of individual units according to the Smoke-Free Apartme <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/winters-housing-to-soon-be-smoke-free/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/winters-housing-to-soon-be-smoke-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parents&#8217; smoking gives 15,000 children a year asthma, doctors warn</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/parents-smoking-gives-15000-children-a-year-asthma-doctors-warn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/parents-smoking-gives-15000-children-a-year-asthma-doctors-warn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asthma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parents' smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondhand smoke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=4227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tens of thousands of children in the UK every year get asthma, chest infections and ear problems because they are exposed to smoke from their parents&#8217; cigarettes, doctors reveal today.
Secondhand smoke causes 15,400 children between three and 16 to develop asthma, gives 20,500 two or under a chest infection and 121,400 under-16s an infected middle ear, a report from the Royal College of Physicians warns. Another 600 under-16s get meningitis, 7,200 babies start wheezing and 40 children die of sudden infant death syndrome owing to passive smoking, the study says.
In total 165,000 children  <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/parents-smoking-gives-15000-children-a-year-asthma-doctors-warn/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/parents-smoking-gives-15000-children-a-year-asthma-doctors-warn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>30-M Filipinos exposed to cigarette smoke at home</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/30-m-filipinos-exposed-to-cigarette-smoke-at-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/30-m-filipinos-exposed-to-cigarette-smoke-at-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GATS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondhand smoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=4165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some 29.8 million Filipinos are exposed to cigarette smoke inside their homes, a national survey said, prompting health authorities to campaign against smoking even inside homes and in public places.
The first Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) revealed that “almost half of Filipinos,” or 48.8 percent of those who were surveyed, are inhaling tobacco smoke inside their dwellings while 54 percent, representing 32.9 million of the population reported that someone smokes inside their homes.
The GATS 2009 gathered a total of 9,705 individuals 15 years old and above living in rural and urban are <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/30-m-filipinos-exposed-to-cigarette-smoke-at-home/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/30-m-filipinos-exposed-to-cigarette-smoke-at-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government&#8217;s anti-cigarette drive to stop you smoking at the wheel and at home</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/governments-anti-cigarette-drive-to-stop-you-smoking-at-the-wheel-and-at-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/governments-anti-cigarette-drive-to-stop-you-smoking-at-the-wheel-and-at-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Burnham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheap cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke-free cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke-free homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vending machines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=3478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
Cigarettes to be sold in plain, grey, logo-free packets
Sale of tobacco from vending machines to be banned
Smoking to be banned at entrances to buildings

Plans to cut the number of smokers by pressurising them not to light up at home and in cars have been unveiled.
The Government’s ‘tobacco control strategy’ also proposes banning smoking at entrances to buildings and selling cigarettes in plain grey packets as part of a series of policies aimed at halving the number of smokers by 2020.
The plans were dismissed as ‘ meddlesome’ and ‘unworkable’ by critics.
But Health Secretary A <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/governments-anti-cigarette-drive-to-stop-you-smoking-at-the-wheel-and-at-home/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/governments-anti-cigarette-drive-to-stop-you-smoking-at-the-wheel-and-at-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calif. county may outlaw apartment smoking</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/calif-county-may-outlaw-apartment-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/calif-county-may-outlaw-apartment-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar drugstores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell cigarettes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=3426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An official in California wants his county to ban smoking in all apartment buildings and parks and to bar drugstores from selling cigarettes.
Ken Yeager, the newly elected president of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, made his proposals Tuesday in his State of the County address, the San Jose Mercury News reported.
At least two California towns have banned smoking in apartments, and a third is considering it. San Jose, the Santa Clara County seat and biggest city, has already made smoking in parks illegal.
Under Yeager&#8217;s proposal, condominium buildings and townhouses with con <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/calif-county-may-outlaw-apartment-smoking/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/calif-county-may-outlaw-apartment-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Couple taking neighbor to court over smoking</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/couple-taking-neighbor-to-court-over-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/couple-taking-neighbor-to-court-over-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette smoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighbors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=3376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A dispute between neighbors is headed to the courtroom as they quarrel over cigarette smoke wafting over one backyard fence into an Albuquerque couple&#8217;s house.
The nuisance lawsuit pits one woman&#8217;s right to smoke against her neighbors&#8217; right to breathe clean air.
The Martinezes have called a house in the North Valley their home since 1962, and it&#8217;s where they plan to retire.
For the past two years, Linda Garcia has lived in the building right behind them, and the Martinezes say when she smokes in her back yard, they have to breathe it.
Charles Lakins, lawyer for the Mar <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/couple-taking-neighbor-to-court-over-smoking/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/couple-taking-neighbor-to-court-over-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Little Rock Housing Authority begins smoking ban at 1 of 3 city-run apartment complexes</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/little-rock-housing-authority-begins-smoking-ban-at-1-of-3-city-run-apartment-complexes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/little-rock-housing-authority-begins-smoking-ban-at-1-of-3-city-run-apartment-complexes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cumberland Towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Rock Housing Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quit smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke-free plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=3005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Little Rock Housing Authority has banned smoking at one of three city-run apartment complexes as part of a plan to make all of its properties smoke-free by 2012.
The ban on smoking at Cumberland Towers in downtown Little Rock began Friday, and similar bans at Parris Towers and Powell Towers will go into effect in 2011 and 2012, respectively.
Housing Authority Director Shelly Ehenger says the regulatory agency has been working on its smoke-free plan since 2008.
The apartment complexes are for low-income families, senior citizens and those with disabilities. To live at Cumberland Towers or P <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/little-rock-housing-authority-begins-smoking-ban-at-1-of-3-city-run-apartment-complexes/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/little-rock-housing-authority-begins-smoking-ban-at-1-of-3-city-run-apartment-complexes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Little Rock Housing Authority makes Cumberland Towers smoke free</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccouse.info/little-rock-housing-authority-makes-cumberland-towers-smoke-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccouse.info/little-rock-housing-authority-makes-cumberland-towers-smoke-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Households]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-smoking policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoke-free decisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccouse.info/?p=2935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new year usually means new resolutions for many people. And for the tenants of Little Rock&#8217;s Cumberland Towers, if it includes quitting smoking, the housing authority is trying to help them. The city announced the no-smoking policy for the apartment complex on Friday.
They say the move is to promote a healthy and productive lifestyle for their tenants but the initiative is not sitting well with some of the community members.
A few times since she started smoking 44 years ago, Julie McCoy has tried and tried to quit and as always she&#8217;s found that it&#8217;s easier said than done.  <a href='http://www.tobaccouse.info/little-rock-housing-authority-makes-cumberland-towers-smoke-free/' rel="nofollow">... Jump to full article >></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccouse.info/little-rock-housing-authority-makes-cumberland-towers-smoke-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

